Wooden tobacco pipe
Wooden tobacco pipe
California became the largest U.S. state to ban flavoured tobacco products on Tuesday, the Associated Press reports, with voters upholding a law that restricts the sale of products including menthol cigarettes and fruit-flavoured vaping liquids.

As of Wednesday morning, 41% of Californians’ ballots had been counted. Within that group, almost two-thirds voted in favour of the ban, according to the Associated Press, which was enough to declare a win. The policy does not apply to hookah, premium cigars, or loose-leaf tobacco.

It was a long and expensive road to reach that outcome. California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill banning the sale of flavoured tobacco in 2020, but it was met with strong pushback from the tobacco industry. More than 620,000 verified voters signed on to a Big Tobacco-backed initiative to reverse the law, landing the issue on ballots this year as Proposition 31. Voters could either opt to uphold or repeal the law.

Massachusetts became the first U.S. state to ban flavoured-tobacco sales in 2019, and several other states—including New York, New Jersey, and Rhode Island—have placed similar restrictions on some flavoured products. Historically, California has favoured tobacco regulation. In 2019, San Francisco became the first U.S. city to ban vaping products, and the cities of Beverly Hills and Manhattan Beach have since outlawed almost all tobacco sales—flavoured or unflavored.

Still, Proposition 31 turned the country’s most populous state into a battleground. Tobacco companies including Philip Morris USA and R.J. Reynolds reportedly spent more than $20 million on their campaign to reverse the ban—a figure dwarfed by the funding provided by billionaire anti-tobacco advocate Michael Bloomberg in support of the law. According to Politico, Bloomberg personally contributed most of the $71 million spent in support of the ban.

Bloomberg and other anti-tobacco advocates have fought for years to limit the availability of flavoured tobacco. They notched a big win earlier this year when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced its intent to ban the sale of menthol cigarettes, citing their role in hooking new smokers and keeping current users addicted. But opponents argue that menthol bans only push users to non-flavoured tobacco products and could add to discriminatory policing issues since menthol cigarettes are disproportionately used by Black Americans.

There’s also plenty of debate over the role of flavours in e-cigarettes. Flavour-ban proponents point to data that show underage vapers overwhelmingly choose flavoured products instead of those that taste like tobacco. They argue that prohibiting flavoured vaping liquids could dissuade young people from picking up the habit and potentially becoming addicted to nicotine. Meanwhile, some researchers and vaping advocates note that adults who use e-cigarettes to transition away from deadly combustible cigarettes also like flavoured products and might not make the switch if palatable flavours weren’t available.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Eradicating polio is finally within reach. Why is the UK taking its foot off the pedal?

Despite the Covid pandemic, there have been just two recorded cases of…

House Republicans demand answers about why Facebook censoredlab leak theories

The Daily Mail has consistently questioned the consensus that COVID-19 was transmitted…

Fauci is slammed for his ‘dangerously arrogant’ I AM SCIENCEstatement

Dr Anthony Fauci raised the hackles of conservative pundits and his critics…

Arsenic levels trigger recall of Beech-Nut infant cereal

Excessive levels of arsenic in some samples of Single Grain Rice infant…